




The incident occurred in June 2017 when the glass handling machine tipped over while reversing. A representative from the involved business suggested that the machine's anti-crush functionality might have inadvertently been activated, causing it to lurch and topple under the load of a substantial glass sheet that measured 9.5 metres in height. Speed was also cited as a potential factor.
QBE, the insurer, initially rejected the claim based on assessments from the machine supplier's managing director and their own loss adjuster. These experts contended that the mishap was likely due to the glass panel being lifted off-centre and the boom being set too high during operation.
In contrast, the business's own glass specialist attributed the incident to operator error. Their argument highlighted the challenges in precisely aligning the lifting point with the panel's centre of gravity, particularly as it shifts when the machine rotates.
AFCA's ruling pointed out that, while the glass should normally be lifted at its centre of gravity, as per the machine's manual, the actual situation involved more complex dynamics. The authority found no definitive evidence that not adhering fully to these instructions directly led to the incident, and thus deemed the insurer's exclusion inapplicable. Furthermore, AFCA cast doubt on the supplier's MD's technical conclusions and his potential conflict of interest.
Ultimately, the decision underscores the importance of nuanced technical assessments in insurance disputes and calls for insurers to thoroughly investigate all claims aspects.
Looking forward, this ruling could influence future disputes where operational mishaps intersect with technical manual prescriptions, potentially prompting insurers to revisit their evaluation protocols and company guidance concerning machinery operation claims.
Published:Wednesday, 6th Aug 2025
Source: Paige Estritori
![]() |
AFCA Rules on Disputed Car Insurance Payout 22 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decided against a man's claim for a car insurance payout, which he pursued following a dispute with his ex-wife. The issue arose when the man's Toyota Landcruiser was involved in an accident in April, prompting him to file for a cash settlement of $55,950. However, the ex-wife, who held the insurance policy, later blocked his access to the payout. - read more |
![]() |
APRA Addresses Home Insurance Affordability Challenges with New Initiatives 22 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has highlighted the ongoing challenges of home insurance affordability, emphasizing that the issue remains complex despite a recent moderation in reinsurance costs. APRA Chair John Lonsdale noted that multiple factors contribute to this difficulty, not solely reinsurance expenses. APRA is actively engaging with insurers, government agencies, and the private sector to address these affordability issues. - read more |
![]() |
ASIC Calls for Revamp in Life Insurance Sales and Service 21 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has issued a call to action for life insurance companies, urging them to enhance their product offerings and sales processes. While acknowledging some progress since the Hayne Royal Commission, ASIC highlights ongoing issues within the industry. The regulator emphasized the importance of centering strategies around customer needs, particularly as companies aim to expand direct-to-consumer sales. - read more |
![]() |
Regulatory Scrutiny Reveals Ongoing Failures in Direct Life Insurance Sales 20 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released findings from a recent review, revealing persistent deficiencies in the direct sales practices of the life insurance industry. Despite heightened scrutiny following the Hayne Royal Commission, challenges remain in several key areas, including product design, sales strategies, remuneration, and customer complaint handling. - read more |
![]() |
Life Insurers Urge Government Action on Mental Health Funding 19 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori Life insurers in Australia have joined forces with mental health advocates to press the federal government to honour its $1 billion pledge for mental health initiatives. The Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) is among the key signatories of an open letter organized by Australians for Mental Health, urging swift action on funding allocation. - read more |