Car Insurance Online :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A car enthusiast's efforts to boost his insurance payout from $78,000 to $200,000 after his rare vehicle was destroyed by fire have been thwarted.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

NHVR Prohibition Notice Puts Fleet Systems Under the Insurance Microscope
NHVR Prohibition Notice Puts Fleet Systems Under the Insurance Microscope
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
A fresh National Heavy Vehicle Regulator action against a heavy vehicle operator is a timely reminder that insurance risk is not limited to what happens at the moment of a crash. The NHVR announced on 30 October 2026 that it had issued a prohibition notice after identifying significant and ongoing safety risks, including repeated defects in safety-critical systems and concerns about the operator’s management controls. - read more
Diagnosis timing is not the only test for income cover
Diagnosis timing is not the only test for income cover
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
A recent income protection dispute has put fresh attention on a difficult but important issue for Australian workers: a medical condition may be treated as pre-existing even where a formal diagnosis comes later. The case, reported on 9 November 2026, involved a prostate cancer claim that was declined after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority accepted that earlier medical warning signs and specialist investigations were enough to trigger a pre-existing condition exclusion. - read more
Fuel Recovery Order Restarts, Raising Insurance Budget Questions
Fuel Recovery Order Restarts, Raising Insurance Budget Questions
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
The Fair Work Commission’s varied fuel cost recovery order will restart obligations from 23 November 2026, requiring covered road transport contractual chains to account for higher fuel costs against the 6 March 2026 benchmark. For truck operators, the immediate issue is contract pricing, but the insurance angle is also important: cash flow, route choices, subcontracting arrangements and vehicle utilisation all influence how risk is presented and managed. - read more
Court Ruling Highlights Why TPD Wording Matters for Business Owners
Court Ruling Highlights Why TPD Wording Matters for Business Owners
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
A Queensland Court of Appeal decision involving AIA Australia has put renewed attention on how technical policy conditions can affect total and permanent disability claims, and why business owners should not treat insurance wording as a background detail. The case concerned group TPD cover held through superannuation, but its broader message is relevant to SMEs that rely on life, TPD and disability-style cover to protect debt, ownership arrangements and business continuity. - read more
Latest Claims Data Shows Why Policy Structure Still Matters
Latest Claims Data Shows Why Policy Structure Still Matters
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
APRA’s latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics, released on 16 October 2026 and covering the 12 months to 30 June 2026, provide a useful reminder for Australian businesses: the practical value of cover often depends on how clearly it is structured, documented and understood before a claim ever arises. - read more


Car Insurance Articles

Comprehensive Car Insurance: Is It Worth the Investment?
Comprehensive Car Insurance: Is It Worth the Investment?
When you're a new driver in Australia, understanding car insurance can be a bit overwhelming. - read more
Are Extras Worth the Investment? Unpacking Car Insurance Add-Ons
Are Extras Worth the Investment? Unpacking Car Insurance Add-Ons
Car insurance is an essential part of owning a vehicle in Australia, providing financial protection and peace of mind. Standard coverage typically includes protection against collision damage, theft, and various liabilities. However, the world of car insurance doesn’t stop here; enter the realm of 'extras' - additional options that go beyond the basics. - read more
Car Insurance Savings: Tactics Aussies Can Use for Lowering Their Premiums
Car Insurance Savings: Tactics Aussies Can Use for Lowering Their Premiums
Car insurance is an essential aspect of vehicle ownership for Australians, providing financial protection in case of accidents, theft, and other unforeseen events. As with any form of insurance, the premiums you pay can vary widely, so understanding the factors that influence these costs is critical. - read more
Why Do Age-Related Factors Matter in Car Insurance Premium Calculations?
Why Do Age-Related Factors Matter in Car Insurance Premium Calculations?
Car insurance is an essential part of owning and driving a vehicle, providing protection and peace of mind on the road. While most Australians are familiar with the basic coverage options, understanding the finer details of premium calculations can be quite complex. One of the key factors influencing these calculations is age. - read more
Agreed Value and Market Value in Car Insurance Explained
Agreed Value and Market Value in Car Insurance Explained
Agreed value and market value affect how your car may be valued if it is written off or stolen. Understanding the difference can help Australian drivers compare comprehensive car insurance policies more carefully. - read more

Knowledgebase
Deductible:
The amount you must pay out-of-pocket for expenses before your insurance company covers the remaining costs.