Car Insurance Online :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A car enthusiast's efforts to boost his insurance payout from $78,000 to $200,000 after his rare vehicle was destroyed by fire have been thwarted.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

Why load restraint is an insurance issue for truck operators
Why load restraint is an insurance issue for truck operators
27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Recent transport industry reporting has again drawn attention to load restraint, with regulators and enforcement agencies continuing to highlight the risks created by poorly secured freight. For Australian truck operators, the issue is broader than avoiding roadside penalties. A load that moves, spills or falls can quickly become a vehicle damage, cargo, public liability, injury and business interruption problem. - read more
What Builder Collapses Mean for Tradies on the Job
What Builder Collapses Mean for Tradies on the Job
27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Australia's construction sector continues to face pressure, with recent business reporting again pointing to elevated insolvency risk among builders and related operators. For tradespeople, that is not just a headline about another company's balance sheet. A builder collapse can quickly become a practical problem for subcontractors who have materials on site, tools locked in a compound, unpaid invoices, unfinished work and unclear responsibility for damaged or abandoned projects. - read more
New claims data sharpens focus on income protection details
New claims data sharpens focus on income protection details
27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
APRA's latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics have again put the practical side of personal cover in front of Australian workers. While headline numbers often focus on the overall performance of life insurers, the data is especially relevant for anyone relying on income protection insurance or salary continuance cover to keep household cash flow steady after illness or injury. - read more
Why defect checks matter for truck insurance
Why defect checks matter for truck insurance
27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Recent heavy vehicle industry reporting has again highlighted roadside compliance activity, with enforcement attention on mechanical condition, fatigue records, load restraint and day-to-day maintenance evidence. For truck operators, the message is broader than avoiding an infringement. A defect notice, preventable breakdown or poorly documented maintenance program can also shape how an insurer views risk when cover is renewed or when a claim is assessed. - read more
Insurance Tax Debate Puts Farm Premiums Back in Focus
Insurance Tax Debate Puts Farm Premiums Back in Focus
26 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Renewed industry pressure to reduce insurance taxes has put affordability back in the spotlight for rural and regional Australia. The latest debate centres on the extra costs added to insurance through state-based duties, levies and other charges, which can make already expensive cover harder to maintain for households and businesses exposed to flood, bushfire, storm and cyclone risk. - read more


Car Insurance Articles

Tips for Finding Affordable Car Insurance Without Sacrificing Coverage in Australia
Tips for Finding Affordable Car Insurance Without Sacrificing Coverage in Australia
Car insurance is a crucial aspect of owning a vehicle, providing financial protection in case of accidents, theft, and other unexpected events. However, finding the right balance between affordability and adequate coverage can be a challenging task. - read more
How to Read a Car Insurance Policy Document in Australia
How to Read a Car Insurance Policy Document in Australia
A car insurance quote is only a starting point. Before choosing or renewing cover, Australian drivers should read the policy documents carefully to understand inclusions, exclusions, excesses, conditions, cooling-off rights and claims obligations. - read more
Are Extras Worth the Investment? Unpacking Car Insurance Add-Ons
Are Extras Worth the Investment? Unpacking Car Insurance Add-Ons
Car insurance is an essential part of owning a vehicle in Australia, providing financial protection and peace of mind. Standard coverage typically includes protection against collision damage, theft, and various liabilities. However, the world of car insurance doesn’t stop here; enter the realm of 'extras' - additional options that go beyond the basics. - read more
The Art of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes for Max Savings in Australia
The Art of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes for Max Savings in Australia
Car insurance is a critical component of responsible vehicle ownership in Australia. With roads bustling with diverse traffic, from urban highways to outback tracks, safeguarding your journey becomes indispensable. However, the complex world of car insurance can bewilder even the most astute driver. This article embarks on a quest to demystify the process of comparing car insurance quotes, aiming for not just coverage, but substantial savings too. - read more
Don't Get Caught: Essential Tips for Avoiding Car Insurance Mistakes
Don't Get Caught: Essential Tips for Avoiding Car Insurance Mistakes
When it comes to protecting your vehicle and your finances, car insurance is a crucial investment. In Australia, car insurance helps cover the costs associated with accidents, theft, and other unexpected events on the road. - read more

Knowledgebase
Subrogation:
The process by which an insurance company seeks to recover the amount paid to the policyholder from a third party responsible for the loss.