Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why Insurer Resilience Rules Matter for Shop Owners

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s insurance sector is adjusting to a tougher operational risk environment, with APRA’s CPS 230 standard placing greater emphasis on resilience, business continuity and oversight of critical service providers. While the rules are aimed at regulated financial institutions rather than individual shop owners, the flow-on effects are worth watching for retailers, cafés, convenience stores and other small businesses that rely on insurers when disruption strikes. - read more

Why Data Breach Trends Matter for Office-Based SMEs

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest data breach reporting is a timely reminder that cyber exposure is no longer confined to large corporates or technology companies. For office-based SMEs, the risks often sit in everyday systems: email accounts, cloud platforms, payroll files, client databases, accounting software and shared devices. When those systems are compromised, the impact can move quickly from an IT inconvenience to a business interruption, liability and reputation problem. - read more

What complaint trends mean for life insurance buyers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that buying life cover is not only about finding the lowest premium. For New Zealand households, the real test of a policy often comes years later, when a claim is made and the insurer checks whether the policy terms have been met. - read more

Why insurance complaint trends matter before you need to claim

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that the real test of any policy comes at claim time. For New Zealand households relying on regular wages, the issue is especially important when the cover is designed to replace income after illness or injury. - read more

What Stronger Conduct Expectations Mean for Income Protection Customers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New Zealand’s financial conduct regime continues to reshape expectations for insurers, with the Financial Markets Authority keeping close attention on whether financial institutions can demonstrate fair outcomes for customers. For people who rely on Income Protection Insurance, the shift is more than a compliance story. It affects how policies are explained, how claims are handled, and how insurers monitor whether customers are receiving value from their cover. - read more

Click for more Insurance News