Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
3
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Two farmhouses seeking insurance payouts for earthquake damage have had their claims denied, following a decision highlighting the role of pre-existing issues.
The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
The Australian insurtech sector is experiencing significant growth, with startups introducing innovative solutions that enhance efficiency, security, and customer engagement within the insurance industry. A recent report titled 'Insurtech Down Under: Trends, Tech and Triumphs' highlights the pivotal role these companies play in reshaping the market. - read more
The Australian insurance industry is facing unprecedented challenges due to a significant rise in mental health-related claims. The Council of Australian Life Insurers reports that mental health has become the leading cause of total and permanent disability claims, accounting for nearly one in three payouts. - read more
Australian consumer advocacy groups are intensifying their calls for substantial reforms in the insurance industry's claims handling processes. The Australian Consumers Insurance Lobby (ACIL) has criticised the current system, highlighting ongoing issues that compromise consumer outcomes. - read more
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced legal action against QBE Insurance (Australia), alleging that the insurer misled more than 500,000 customers regarding promised discounts on various insurance products over a five-year period from July 2017 to September 2022. - read more
Australia's transport and haulage sector is currently navigating a period of heightened operational risk, marked by an uptick in both the frequency and severity of motor collision claims. This trend underscores the pressing need for fleet operators to adopt proactive risk management strategies and leverage advanced insurance solutions to safeguard their operations. - read more
Comprehensive car cover is a type of vehicle insurance policy that provides the most extensive range of protection. It aims to cover a wide array of potential events that could affect your car. - read more
Car insurance is an essential part of owning a vehicle in Australia, providing financial protection and peace of mind. Standard coverage typically includes protection against collision damage, theft, and various liabilities. However, the world of car insurance doesn’t stop here; enter the realm of 'extras' - additional options that go beyond the basics. - read more
When it comes to protecting your vehicle and your finances, car insurance is a crucial investment. In Australia, car insurance helps cover the costs associated with accidents, theft, and other unexpected events on the road. - read more
Insurance jargon refers to the specialized terminology and phrases used within the insurance industry. These terms can often be confusing and complicated for those not familiar with the field. - read more
Car insurance is a crucial aspect of responsible vehicle ownership. It provides financial protection against accidents, theft, and other unforeseen events. In Australia, having the right car insurance policy can give you peace of mind on the road. - read more
Knowledgebase
Policyholder: The individual or entity who owns the insurance policy.
