Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

APRA Enforces Additional Capital Requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed an additional $2 million capital requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia (SIA), citing significant deficiencies in the insurer's risk management framework and regulatory reporting practices. This action underscores the critical importance of robust risk management within the insurance industry. - read more

Soft Market Conditions Persist in Australian Commercial Insurance Through H1 2026

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian commercial insurance market has maintained its soft stance throughout the first half of 2026, presenting advantageous conditions for buyers. This trend is characterized by stable or declining premiums, expanded insurer capacity, and increased competition across various insurance lines. - read more

2026-27 Federal Budget: Key Impacts on the Australian Insurance Industry

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Government's 2026-27 Federal Budget, presented by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, introduces several measures with direct implications for the insurance sector. These initiatives aim to address challenges such as property insurance costs and underinsurance, while certain omissions have raised questions within the industry. - read more

NRMA's Departure from Farm Insurance: What It Means for Australian Farmers

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant shift within the Australian insurance landscape, NRMA has announced its withdrawal from the farm insurance market, ceasing the sale of new policies as of July 1, 2025. This decision affects both hobby and commercial farm insurance policies, leaving many farmers in search of alternative coverage options. - read more

Achmea and Protected Cropping Australia Join Forces to Support Greenhouse Farmers

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Achmea Farm Insurance and Protected Cropping Australia (PCA) have announced a strategic partnership aimed at bolstering risk mitigation and resilience within Australia's protected cropping sector. This collaboration seeks to empower greenhouse and glasshouse growers by providing tailored insurance solutions and fostering knowledge exchange on best practices. - read more

Click for more Insurance News