Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Cafe's Underinsurance Leads to Reduced Storm Damage Payout

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent case underscores the critical importance of ensuring adequate insurance coverage for businesses. A cafe and catering business, forced to close after a storm, faced a significant reduction in its insurance claim due to underinsurance. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Restaurant's Arson Claim Amid Non-Disclosure Dispute

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has significant implications for business insurance policies, particularly concerning the disclosure of directors' criminal histories. - read more

NSW Implements Stricter Penalties to Combat CTP Claims Farming

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The New South Wales (NSW) government has taken decisive action to curb the practice of claims farming within the Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance scheme, introducing legislation that imposes significant penalties on such activities. - read more

NSW Strata Managers to Eliminate Insurance Commissions by 2026

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move towards greater transparency, the Strata Community Association New South Wales (SCA NSW) has announced that, starting January 1, 2026, its members will phase out the acceptance of insurance commissions in their management contracts. This shift aims to replace traditional commission-based remuneration with a clear fee-for-service model, aligning with evolving industry standards and consumer expectations. - read more

Victoria Offers Latent Defects Insurance as Alternative to Strata Building Bond

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Victorian Government has passed legislation introducing a developer-paid Strata Building Bond, establishing essential consumer protections for purchasers of new apartments. In alignment with this legislation, the government is progressing new regulations to allow developers to insure new apartment projects with a 10-year Latent Defects Insurance (LDI) policy, Resilience LDI, as an alternative to the traditional Strata Building Bond. - read more

Click for more Insurance News