Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

10

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

TAL Collaborates with Insurtech to Launch Embedded Life Insurance 17 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Australia's prominent life insurer, TAL, has partnered with the global insurtech firm, Cover Genius, to introduce an innovative 'digital-only', embedded life insurance product. This new solution aims to serve Australian workers such as part-time employees, contractors, and casual staff who often lack access to affordable insurance coverage. - read more

Growing Mistrust in New Zealand Insurers Amid Rising Costs 17 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Recent findings from a Consumer NZ survey highlight increasing skepticism towards insurers in New Zealand, as affordability remains a significant concern for many. The survey noted that insurance now ranks as the fourth-largest financial pressure among respondents, trailing housing, food, and household debt, marking an upward shift from sixth place last October. This change has negatively impacted the industry's reputation, with more individuals expressing distrust towards insurers. - read more

No Refund Policy Upheld in Camper Tent Dispute 16 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has supported Open Insurance's decision to deny a refund to a customer who cancelled his motor policy after being informed that his new rooftop tent installation would breach policy guidelines. The policyholder was advised that any modifications, including a 'slip on camper/tent or camper conversion,' would void coverage, prompting him to cancel his insurance in March. - read more

Acenda Secures Four Key Wins at Life Insurance Excellence Awards 16 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori In a triumphant moment for Australian life insurer Acenda, the company secured top honours in four of the ten categories at the Australian Life Underwriting and Claims Association (ALUCA) Life Insurance Excellence Awards. Formerly known as MLC Life Insurance, Acenda emerged as a finalist in nine categories, ultimately winning the Leadership Award, Claims Team Award, Customer Service Team Award, and Partnership Impact Team Award. - read more

AFCA Upholds Insurer's Decision on Claimant's Non-Disclosure 12 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) supported Auto & General's decision to deny a motor policyholder's claim after a crash. The decision stemmed from the policyholder's failure to disclose a driving-related good behaviour bond, despite his claims of a learning disability affecting his understanding of the policy's inquiries. - read more