Car Insurance Online :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has mandated that Insurance Manufacturers of Australia compensate a claimant whose car was stolen while it was parked at a friend's residence.

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

NHVR Prohibition Notice Puts Fleet Systems Under the Insurance Microscope
NHVR Prohibition Notice Puts Fleet Systems Under the Insurance Microscope
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
A fresh National Heavy Vehicle Regulator action against a heavy vehicle operator is a timely reminder that insurance risk is not limited to what happens at the moment of a crash. The NHVR announced on 30 October 2026 that it had issued a prohibition notice after identifying significant and ongoing safety risks, including repeated defects in safety-critical systems and concerns about the operator’s management controls. - read more
Diagnosis timing is not the only test for income cover
Diagnosis timing is not the only test for income cover
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
A recent income protection dispute has put fresh attention on a difficult but important issue for Australian workers: a medical condition may be treated as pre-existing even where a formal diagnosis comes later. The case, reported on 9 November 2026, involved a prostate cancer claim that was declined after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority accepted that earlier medical warning signs and specialist investigations were enough to trigger a pre-existing condition exclusion. - read more
Fuel Recovery Order Restarts, Raising Insurance Budget Questions
Fuel Recovery Order Restarts, Raising Insurance Budget Questions
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
The Fair Work Commission’s varied fuel cost recovery order will restart obligations from 23 November 2026, requiring covered road transport contractual chains to account for higher fuel costs against the 6 March 2026 benchmark. For truck operators, the immediate issue is contract pricing, but the insurance angle is also important: cash flow, route choices, subcontracting arrangements and vehicle utilisation all influence how risk is presented and managed. - read more
Court Ruling Highlights Why TPD Wording Matters for Business Owners
Court Ruling Highlights Why TPD Wording Matters for Business Owners
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
A Queensland Court of Appeal decision involving AIA Australia has put renewed attention on how technical policy conditions can affect total and permanent disability claims, and why business owners should not treat insurance wording as a background detail. The case concerned group TPD cover held through superannuation, but its broader message is relevant to SMEs that rely on life, TPD and disability-style cover to protect debt, ownership arrangements and business continuity. - read more
Latest Claims Data Shows Why Policy Structure Still Matters
Latest Claims Data Shows Why Policy Structure Still Matters
12 Nov 2026: Paige Estritori
APRA’s latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics, released on 16 October 2026 and covering the 12 months to 30 June 2026, provide a useful reminder for Australian businesses: the practical value of cover often depends on how clearly it is structured, documented and understood before a claim ever arises. - read more


Car Insurance Articles

Understanding Add-Ons: Optional Car Insurance Coverages to Enhance Your Policy
Understanding Add-Ons: Optional Car Insurance Coverages to Enhance Your Policy
Car insurance is a crucial aspect of responsible vehicle ownership. It provides financial protection against accidents, theft, and other unforeseen events. In Australia, having the right car insurance policy can give you peace of mind on the road. - read more
Comprehensive Car Insurance: Is It Worth the Investment?
Comprehensive Car Insurance: Is It Worth the Investment?
When you're a new driver in Australia, understanding car insurance can be a bit overwhelming. - read more
Is Comprehensive Car Cover Worth It? Exploring the Benefits for Australian Drivers
Is Comprehensive Car Cover Worth It? Exploring the Benefits for Australian Drivers
Comprehensive car cover is a type of vehicle insurance policy that provides the most extensive range of protection. It aims to cover a wide array of potential events that could affect your car. - read more
Don’t Let These Hidden Costs Drain Your Car Insurance Budget
Don’t Let These Hidden Costs Drain Your Car Insurance Budget
Car insurance is an essential expenditure for any vehicle owner, but are you truly aware of all the costs involved? Many Australians focus solely on the premiums, overlooking additional charges that can significantly impact their budget. Understanding these hidden costs is crucial to avoid an unpleasant surprise. - read more
Comprehensive vs Third Party Car Insurance: Which Car Insurance Is Right for You?
Comprehensive vs Third Party Car Insurance: Which Car Insurance Is Right for You?
Choosing car insurance in Australia is easier when you understand what each policy type is designed to cover. Comprehensive car insurance offers broader protection for your own vehicle and other people's property, while third party property cover is more limited and usually focuses on damage you cause to others. - read more

Knowledgebase
Beneficiary:
The person or entity designated to receive the death benefit from a life insurance policy.