Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Victoria’s owners corporation sector has moved into a new stage of reform after the state government released its response to an expert review of the Owners Corporations Act 2006. While the review recommended stronger controls over payments and benefits linked to owners corporation managers, including commission-style arrangements, the government has stopped short of an immediate ban and will undertake further analysis before deciding how far the changes should go. - read more
Youi’s latest comments to the federal parliamentary inquiry into small business insurance have put a practical question back in front of Australian sole traders and small operators: is cheaper, simpler direct insurance always better, or does advice still matter when business risks become more complex? - read more
Australian small business owners are showing growing interest in tax audit insurance as the Australian Taxation Office increases compliance attention across several sectors, including professional services. For freelancers, consultants and sole traders, the trend is a timely reminder that tax administration is not just a bookkeeping task; it is a business risk that can create real financial pressure if an enquiry lands at the wrong time. - read more
Australia’s commercial insurance market has moved into a more favourable phase for many business buyers in the first half of 2026, with industry reporting pointing to stronger insurer appetite, broader capacity and easing pressure across several key classes. For personal trainers, fitness instructors and small studio operators, the message is not that cover is suddenly simple or cheap. - read more
A fresh policy debate is emerging over how Australians are introduced to financial products, including life insurance. The Federal Government has been considering tighter controls on lead generation after concerns about poor conduct in parts of the financial services market, including the collapses of Shield and First Guardian. The life insurance sector is now warning that an overly broad crackdown could unintentionally make it harder for everyday households to find suitable cover. - read more
Car insurance premiums are the amounts paid regularly to maintain an active car insurance policy. These payments can be made on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis, depending on the terms agreed upon with your insurance provider. - read more
Car insurance is a necessary expense for anyone who owns a vehicle. It provides financial protection against accidents, theft, and other unexpected events. In Australia, having comprehensive car insurance can save you significant costs down the line. However, what many drivers may not realise is how their driving habits can directly influence their insurance premiums. - read more
When it comes to car insurance for new drivers in Australia, navigating through the options can be overwhelming. Understanding the various factors that impact insurance premiums is crucial for making informed decisions. - read more
Filing a car insurance claim can be a complex and overwhelming task. Understanding the process is crucial to ensure that everything goes smoothly and you get the compensation you deserve. - read more
Car insurance is a crucial component of responsible vehicle ownership. It offers financial protection against unforeseen events on the road, providing peace of mind for drivers across the country. In Australia, navigating the world of car insurance can initially seem daunting, but understanding the basics can make the process smoother and more intuitive. - read more
Knowledgebase
Actuary: A professional who analyzes the financial costs of risk and uncertainty using mathematics, statistics, and financial theory.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.