Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A second H5 bird flu detection in New South Wales has moved avian disease risk from a distant global concern to a practical on-farm planning issue for Australian producers. The latest case involved a petrel found at Hawks Nest on the NSW Mid North Coast, following an earlier detection at the same beach. Authorities have indicated the human health risk remains low, and there has been no reported H5 detection in NSW commercial poultry flocks at this stage. - read more
The latest reporting on the Partnered Health cyber attack may be a wake-up call for allied health practices that store patient information, uses shared booking systems or relies on cloud-based clinical software. The healthcare group, which operates more than 60 clinics nationally, became aware on 23 June 2026 that a malicious actor had accessed data from some clinics. Potentially affected patients were not notified publicly until more than three weeks later. - read more
A cyber attack disclosed by Partnered Health Group on 15 July 2026 has put health-related data security back on the agenda for Australian service businesses. The incident reportedly affected patient information across 21 clinics in multiple states and territories, including contact details, Medicare information, private health insurance details and medical records. While this was a healthcare provider incident, the lessons are highly relevant for fitness professionals who collect health screening forms, injury histories, progress notes, emergency contacts and payment details. - read more
A new industry report on AI agents has sharpened an issue that many Australian consultants can no longer treat as theoretical: when automated tools make decisions, access client data or carry out tasks, which insurance policy responds if something goes wrong? - read more
A fresh roundtable in Taree has put flood insurance affordability back under the spotlight, more than a year after the May 2025 floods devastated parts of the Manning Valley and Mid North Coast. The discussion, co-hosted by Insurance Council of Australia CEO Andrew Hall and federal MP Alison Penfold, brought together business and council leaders to examine why recovery alone is not enough when the underlying flood risk remains. - read more
Car insurance customisation refers to the process of tailoring an insurance policy to fit the specific needs and circumstances of an individual driver or business. Unlike standard, one-size-fits-all policies, customised car insurance allows for the inclusion and exclusion of coverage options based on the unique requirements of the insured party. - read more
Car insurance is a critical aspect of vehicle ownership that can save you from financial distress in case of accidents, theft, or damage. For Australian consumers, understanding the ins and outs of car insurance is essential for ensuring that you're adequately protected without overpaying for your coverage. - read more
Filing a car insurance claim can be a complex and overwhelming task. Understanding the process is crucial to ensure that everything goes smoothly and you get the compensation you deserve. - read more
Car insurance premiums are the amounts paid regularly to maintain an active car insurance policy. These payments can be made on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis, depending on the terms agreed upon with your insurance provider. - read more
Comprehensive car cover is a type of vehicle insurance policy that provides the most extensive range of protection. It aims to cover a wide array of potential events that could affect your car. - read more
Knowledgebase
Beneficiary: The person or entity designated to receive the death benefit from a life insurance policy.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.