Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
In the Australian beauty industry, professionals such as beauticians, hairdressers, and salon owners are facing significant challenges due to escalating insurance premiums. This trend is largely attributed to a lack of competition among insurers, leading to higher costs and limited options for coverage. - read more
As of May 1, 2026, Australian Football League (AFL) players will no longer have insurance coverage for brain injuries under their superannuation policies. This change comes after Zurich Insurance decided to exclude total and permanent disability (TPD) benefits for claims related to traumatic head injuries, concussions, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), post-concussion syndrome, or any neurological impairments linked to brain injury. - read more
Dynamic Insurance Services has filed a competition lawsuit against Steadfast Group, QBE Insurance, and Allianz Australia Insurance, alleging that these companies engaged in coordinated conduct that effectively cut off its access to essential insurance products. The lawsuit, filed in March 2026, claims that Steadfast terminated its network agreement with Dynamic in early 2026, followed by QBE and Allianz ending their arrangements. This sequence of events led to the loss of authorized representatives and significantly impaired Dynamic's ability to operate effectively. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced significant reforms to the capital treatment of longevity products, including annuities, aimed at bolstering the sustainability and affordability of retirement income products. These changes are set to take effect from 1 July 2026. - read more
Recent findings from the Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC) have revealed a significant increase in delays related to income protection and Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claims processing. Violations of the industry's standards on timely income protection payments have surged by 67% in the 2024-25 period, raising concerns about the efficiency and reliability of insurers in supporting claimants during critical times. - read more
When it comes to protecting your vehicle and your finances, car insurance is a crucial investment. In Australia, car insurance helps cover the costs associated with accidents, theft, and other unexpected events on the road. - read more
Car insurance customisation refers to the process of tailoring an insurance policy to fit the specific needs and circumstances of an individual driver or business. Unlike standard, one-size-fits-all policies, customised car insurance allows for the inclusion and exclusion of coverage options based on the unique requirements of the insured party. - read more
Car insurance is a necessary expense for anyone who owns a vehicle. It provides financial protection against accidents, theft, and other unexpected events. In Australia, having comprehensive car insurance can save you significant costs down the line. However, what many drivers may not realise is how their driving habits can directly influence their insurance premiums. - read more
Comprehensive car cover is a type of vehicle insurance policy that provides the most extensive range of protection. It aims to cover a wide array of potential events that could affect your car. - read more
Knowledgebase
Trauma Insurance: An insurance that pays a lump-sum amount on the diagnosis of one of several critical illnesses or events
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.